References
Allie, S.,Armien, M. N., Bennie, K., Burgoyne, N., Case, J., Craig,T. (2007). Learning as acquiring a discursive identity through participation in a community:A theoretical position on improving student learning in tertiary science and engineering programmes. Unpublished manuscript, Cape Town, South Africa, http://www.cree.uct.ac.za .
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: a cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Biggs, J. B. (1978). Individual and group differences in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 48 (3), 266-279.
Biggs, J. B. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university:What the student does. London: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Biggs, J. B. and Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning:The SOLO taxonomy. New York: New York Academic Press.
Booth, S. (1992). Learning to program: a phenomenographic perspective. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Booth, S. (2001). Learning Computer Science and Engineering in Context. Computer Science Education, 11 (3), 169-188.
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement for Teaching.
Brickhouse, N.W. (2001). Embodying science:A feminist perspective on learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (3), 282-295.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A. and Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18 (1), 32-42.
Carew, A. L., and Mitchell, C. A. (2002). Characterising Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Understanding of Sustainability. European Journal of Engineering Education, 27 (4), 349-361.
Case, J. M. (2004). A critical look at innovative practice from the student perspective. In Baillie, C. and Moore, I. (Eds.), Effective Learning and Teaching in Engineering. Oxford: RoutledgeFalmer.
Case, J. M. and Jawitz, J. (2004). Using situated cognition theory in researching student experience of the workplace. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41 (5), 415-431.
Case, J. M. and Marshall, D. (2004). Between deep and surface: Procedural approaches to learning in engineering contexts. Studies in Higher Education, 29 (5), 605-615.
Case, J. M. and Marshall, D. (in press). Approaches to Learning. In Tight, M., Huisman, J., Mok,
K. H. and Morphew, C. (Eds.). The Routledge International Handbook of Higher Education. London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
Cobb, P. and Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28 (2), 4-15.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer. Felder, R. M. and Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78 (7), 674.
Cousin, Glynis (2006) An introduction to threshold concepts in Planet 17 Higher Education Academy Subject Centre for Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences (GEES). http://www.gees.ac.uk/planet/p17/gc.pdf (accessed 24 November 2008).
Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., Calvo, R. A., and Prosser, M. (2008). Engineering students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning through discussions in face-to-face and online contexts. Learning and Instruction, 18 (3), 267-282.
Gee, J. P. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25 (1), 99-125.
Gee, J. P. (2004). Language in the science classroom: academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy. In Saul,W. (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice. Newark: International Reading Association.
Hammersley, M. (1997). Educational research and teaching: a response to David Hargreaves’TTA lecture. British Educational Research Journal, 23 (2), 141-161.
Jacobs, C. (2007).Towards a critical understanding of the teaching of discipline-specific academic literacies: making the tacit explicit. Journal of Education, 41, 59-82.
Johnson, C. M. (2001). A survey of current research on online communities of practice.The internet and higher education, 4 (1), 45-60.
Kieran, C., Forman, E., and Sfard, A. (2001). Guest editorial learning discourse: sociocultural approaches to research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46 (1-3), 1-12.
Kittleson, J. M., and Southerland, S. A. (2004).The role of discourse in group knowledge construction: a case study of engineering students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41 (3), 267-293.
Kreber, C. (2001). Scholarship revisited: perspectives on the scholarship of teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leach, J. and Scott, P. (2003). Individual and sociocultural views of learning in science education. Science & Education, 12 (1), 91-113.
Lewin, K. (1951). In Cartwright, D. (Ed.), Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper and Row.
Linder, C. J., Fraser, D. M. and Pang, M. F. (2006). Using a variation approach to enhance physics learning in a college classroom. The Physics Teacher, 44 (9), 589.
Marshall, D., Summers, M., and Woolnough, B. (1999). Students’ conceptions of learning in an engineering context. Higher Education, 38 (3), 291-309.
Martin, J., Mitchell, J. and Newell,T. (2003). Development of a concept inventory for fluid mechanics. 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, 5-8 November 2003, Boulder, Colorado, USA. Available online at http://fie-conference.org/fie2003/papers/1386.pdf [accessed 14 December 2009].
Marton, F. and Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Marton, F., Hounsell, D. and Entwistle, N. (Eds.). (1997). The experience of learning (2nd ed.). Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Academic Press.
Marton, F. and Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I – outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46 (1), 4-11.
Matthew, B. and Pritchard, J. (2008). Hard and soft – a useful way of thinking about disciplines? Reflections from engineering education on disciplinary identities. In Kreber, C. (Ed.), The university and its disciplines: teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries. London: Routledge.
Matthews, M. R. (Ed.). (1998). Constructivism in science education: a philosophical examination. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Mouzelis, N. P. (1995). Sociological theory: what went wrong?: Diagnosis and remedies. London: Routledge.
Northedge,A. (2003a). Enabling participation in academic discourse. Teaching in Higher Education, 8 (2), 169-180.
Northedge,A. (2003b). Rethinking teaching in the context of diversity. Teaching in Higher Education, 8 (1), 17-32.
Pang, M. F. (2003).Two faces of variation: On continuity in the phenomenographic movement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47 (2), 145-156.
Perrenet, J. C., Bouhuijs, P.A. J. and Smits, J. G. M. M. (2000).The suitability of problem-based learning for engineering education: theory and practice. Teaching in Higher Education,5 (3), 345-358.
Pfundt, H. and Duit, R. (1994). Bibliography: Students’ alternative frameworks and science education (4th ed.). Kiel: IPN.
Phipps,A. (2002). Engineering Women:The ‘Gendering’ of Professional Identities. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18 (4), 409-414.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W. and Gertzog,W.A. (1982).Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66 (2), 211-227.
Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Reid, N. (2003) Getting started on pedagogic research in the physical sciences. Higher Education Academy Physical Sciences Subject Centre. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/SNAS/snas_708 (accessed 24 November 2008).
Savinainen,A. and Scott, P. (2002).The Force Concept Inventory: a tool for monitoring student learning. Physics Education, 37 (1), 45–52.
Scheps, M. H. and Sadler, P. M. (writer) (1988). A private universe. Pyramid Films.
Seymour, E. (1995).The loss of women from science, mathematics and engineering undergraduate majors: an explanatory account. Science Education, 79 (4), 437-473. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27 (2), 4-13.
Sfard,A. (2001).There is more to discourse than meets the ears: looking at thinking as communicating to learn more about mathematical learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46 (1-3), 13-57.
Stonyer, H. (2002). Making Engineering Students – Making Women:The Discursive Context of Engineering Education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18 (4), 392-399. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. New York:Wiley.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Walker, M. (2001). Engineering identities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22 (1), 75-89.
Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7 (2), 225-246. White, K. R. (1982).The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91 (3), 461-481.
Woolnough, B., Guo,Y., Leite, M. S.,Almeida, M. J. D., Ryu,T. and Wang, Z. (1997). Factors affecting student choice of career in science and engineering: parallel studies in Australia, Canada, China, England, Japan and Portugal. Research in Science and Technological Education, 15 (1), 105-121.
Engineering Subject Centre Learning and Teaching Theory Resources
This guide has been commissioned to complement and develop the Engineering Subject Centre’s existing range of resources about learning and teaching theory, available at http://www.engsc.ac.uk/er/theory/index.asp
